Tutors, instructors, experts, educators, and other professionals on the platform are independent contractors, who use their own styles, methods, and materials and create their own lesson plans based upon their experience, professional judgment, and the learners with whom they engage. Varsity Tutors connects learners with a variety of experts and professionals. Varsity Tutors does not have affiliation with universities mentioned on its website. Media outlet trademarks are owned by the respective media outlets and are not affiliated with Varsity Tutors.Īward-Winning claim based on CBS Local and Houston Press awards. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 83–91.Names of standardized tests are owned by the trademark holders and are not affiliated with Varsity Tutors LLC.Ĥ.9/5.0 Satisfaction Rating based upon cumulative historical session ratings through 12/31/20. Pigeons ( Columba livia) learn to link numerosities with symbols. Xia, L., Emmerton, J., Siemann, M., & Delius, J. Matching of numerical symbols with number of responses by pigeons. Bears “count” too: Quantity estimation and comparison in black bears ( Ursus americanus). Horses ( Equus caballus) select the greater of two quantities in small numerical contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 409–427. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 73–85. Numerical competence in rats ( Rattus norvegicus): Davis and Bradford (1986) extended. Lana chimpanzee learns to count by “NUMATH”: A summary of a videotaped experimental report. Numerical competence in animals, with an insight from ants. Clever Hans: A contribution to experimental animal and human psychology. Putting the elephant back in the herd: Elephant relative quantity judgments match those of other species. Grey parrot numerical competence: A review. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213, 1822–1828. Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 286, 20190238. Symbolic representation of numerosity by honeybees ( Apis mellifera): Matching characters to small quantities. Howard, S., Avargues-Weber, A., Garcia, J. Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Large quantity discrimination by North Island robins ( Petroica longipes). Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, can distinguish more over-marks from fewer over-marks. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 561–615.įerkin, M. Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Counting behavior in animals: A critical evaluation. Counting behavior by rats in a simulated natural environment. Can honeybees count landmarks? Animal Behaviour, 49, 159–164.ĭacke, M., & Srinivasan, M. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 47–51.Ĭhittka, L., & Geiger, K. Indicating acts during counting by a chimpanzee ( Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 23–31.īoysen, S. Numerical competence in a chimpanzee ( Pan troglodytes). “Constructive” enumeration by chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes) on a computerized task. Did you ever hear the one about the horse that could count? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 357.īeran, M. Behavioural Processes, 88, 72–75.īeran, M. Tracking of food quantity by coyotes ( Canis latrans). Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Relative quantity judgments in South American sea lions ( Otaria flavescens). Z., Hernandez-Lloreda, V., Call, J., & Colmenares, F.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |